#10 by kona0197 - 6/27/2003 5:58:00 PM
i use walls from digital blasphemy. They are alot more cherful. I have not found any walls here YET that were not centered around the darker colors... |
Obviously, you have not looked very hard.... For instance, look at Shmoopy's stuff. (That's just one artist of many that make "lighter" stuff)
And, there is cartoon and whimsical stuff, just check out PERERKOFF's wallpapers.
But, the bottom line is: if three different admins comment about "wrong" things in a wall, then it will be rejected. Here is the last part of the "guidelines" (please note the 3 parts that pertain to why this particular wall was rejected):
A few examples of what will never get through moderation:
- Britney Spears or other celebrity wallpapers (see note about copyright above)
- Bryce art, unless the result is so astonishing that one could never tell it was done in Bryce.
- Dolphins, palm trees, metal spheres or other over-used elements - XP-related walls, unless really innovative/original.
- Copyrighted photos/images
- Confused composition...eg...3D artwork with conflicting light-sources belying the form.
- A ground-swell of negativity from a significant number of admins.
1) there is no doubt that it was made in Bryce.
2) Though it is not completely "confused composition", the organic bits were not "right" (water, sun reflection, etc.)
3) There were three admins who commented then a 4th that rejected it. (That's considered a significant number of admins).
But, knowing why it was rejected, if you were to fix the water (so that it looks like a real water texture) and correct the sun reflection and ship lightsource, then put in the "comments" *why the ship is on top of the water, then it would most likely get through.
edited due to forgetting to say half of what I was going to post....not enough coffee yet this morning 
[Message Edited]
