Norton is one of the worst pos along with mcafee.honestly most people are fine and are protected with just what windows loads on your computer.ahh that Microsoft though.i don't use an antivirus just what comes installed by Microsoft and ill tell you between the firewall and windows defender.i don't get jack problems and I'm a power user.honestly most people get viruses from allowing virus programs.they tell you that your whole computer is fucked even though 9 times out of ten that's whats causing it until you purchase.your dll prolly got erased with a Norton update because the way those programs work is this.coding is limited and it searches for strings that's common in viruses.problem is every program in existence uses similar coding at time to a degree.

 

don't believe me fine,but for my whole life ive never had any issues with my computers by not having antivirus bloatware

Reminds me of the guy walking down the city street spraying himself with some odd chemical...and his friend says 'what's that?' and the guy says 'it's my crocodile repellent'...and the other says 'there aren't any crocs in the city...' and the guy says 'see? it works!'

Not having a GOOD AV program means you don't have an indicator of an issue even if you did.

Not knowing is not not having.....

Just yesterday Kaspersky dealt with 2 infected emails on this machine [as they were received].

 

Norton is absolute complete JUNK! Get rid of it.

I've been using Avast Pro Anti-virus for a couple years now. It's very light weight on my system and you would never know it was even there until it detects a threat. It's very affordable for most anyone and I highly recommend it if you are in the market for dependable and hassle free protection.           -- Ace  --

I've been using Norton Internet Secuity for about 3 years, and I've never had any issues with it. I switched to NIS after Avast completely missed a virus that had been around for a long time and was well known.

Oh, yes.  Norton is the WORLD'S BEST AV Software.... provided the criterion is how well it succeeds with FALSE POSITIVES.

The really enjoyable part of this equation is how cleverly it can slander and malign another's reputable software...

WITH SEEMING IMPUNITY.

Norton cannot get its act together to NOT interfere-with-legitimate-software-TOO-DAMN-OFTEN.

 

The living end [for me] was when Norton decided the Microsoft BITS service was 'suspicious/malware' and PERMANENTLY DISABLED IT.

You had essentially 2 choices.... sift through three pages of command line instructions and registry edits.... or completely reinstall Windows.

I discarded 10 months of subscription and said 'fuck you, Norton 3rd strike'...and switched to BitDefender.

Yes, Norton [from what I since heard] hasn't quite repeated that clusterfuck of a 'slight glitch' and now tends to 'only' annoy the shit out of programmers everywhere with false positives.....

Those outside the 'programming industry' probably see that as an improvement.

 

I don't.

Good luck finding an AV that doesn't throw up fp's.Thankfully using the "add to exclusion" option works wonders.It's when they start quarantining windows system files that things start to get hairy..lol..

 

 

It's the best at false positives.

However that's not a good 'quality' to be best at.  It's like being No.1 on a 'most wanted' list.

Actually stopping the bad shit whilst not impacting on the good....that's what would qualify an AV as desirable.

In all the years of using Kaspersky [ever since the first release of Win 7] I have only encountered one false pos..... an installer of an old proggy called 'Sonique'...one of the many skinnables I used to skin for.

Norton on the other hand actually [permanently] disabled BITS.... and just to be absolutely clear....uninstalling Norton wasn't actually a fix.  That did nothing [other than preventing the program from further screwing with an Operating System]....

eh having or not having an antivirus.like I was saying Microsoft comes with bitsdefender windows defender the malware protection update and etc.it usually does its job.ive had some things ppop up on using what Microsoft gives me and I choose to allow it or not.most the time its bs though but eh.perhaps some need the extra crap but I do not.then again I know what sites to stay away from and use adblocker so no spam bs ever gets installed.like I said I rarely have an issue.my computers never lag crash break down.prolly helps that I got a router and a modem both with firewalls on as well.who knows lol

 

ive used a lot of antivirus programs in the past before and I found that most,apart from maybe kapersky and eset are crap.

 

one computer lifespan for me can last up to 10-15 years if it wanted to without hiccups.

 

I just go by my experience.then again it all depends what you do and where you go on your computer.

You can.... but it's terminal.

The thing about being smart and avoiding so-called 'bad' sites, is that it doesn't always ring true.  I have a couple of nephews who frequent pr0n sites regularly and who very rarely get infected, yet I have a nephew who frequents music sites to research stuff [sheet music/recording tools, etc] and he is often infected with various nasties and has an inbox full of spam riddled with spyware, etc.  Yeah, go figure!   The pervert nephews are less trouble when it comes to fixing their PCs.

If you hate tomatoes then their ancestry is irrelevant.

 

It was back around 2004.

Since then Norton improved...which is only fair...it could NOT get worse.

Bottom line...I am no sucker...once bitten and it's F U, arsehole...direct me to anything else....

 

I only ever had any remote interest in Norton as I remembered a time before Symantec ...when Windows was an absurd dream and the world was Dos.

Sadly 'wot's in a name' is merely a phrase from 'The Sentimental Bloke' and definitely not a recommendation for reputation and performance.

1.  OK
2. Agree it was around that time Norton shit the bed, i stopped using Norton after i bought the retail of 2006 Norton Internet Security, it was slowing the crap out of my rig (again Internet Security Suite not AV)
But once i switched to win8 i tried them once more i believe it was the 2013-2014 version and it was/is good.
Need to mention that im not using the Internet Security Suite.
3. Well i can understand that. My Norton sub is running out and im thinking about giving "Fsecure" a shot not because i dont like Norton only because i can have it on multiple devices.
If you guys like, i will record the uninstall process once my subscription ends, im sure there is no removal tool needed anymore to remove it.

Yeah, I feel the same.  A special tool should NOT be necessary to remove a program.... and if one is it sends up a red flag not to install that program.  As for Norton crap being left in the registry, I found that when I got rid of NIS on my laptop..  However, I didn't have to spend too long wheedling it out.  Ccleaner got rid of some, and Advanced System Care pretty much got rid of the rest, leaving just a couple to manually move. 

After doing an 'Everything' search I also found left over files in the Windows folder under System 32, System and SysWOW64.  Oh and in Program Files, Program Data and Common Files as well.  Yup, when Norton gets its hooks in it don't mess around none...it plants files fechen everywhere.

For mine, it should be illegal/classified under malware.