That's pretty natural though. People are fiercely loyal to their own program.
Moreover, your post did come across as advocacy and pretty aggressive at that. I think people here would have responded much the same way if roles were reversed.
That said, Ed's (the developer) boasting was pretty ironic:
Konfabulator offers amazing ease of use and ease of building Widgets that frankly no other similar environment out there can offer. Especially when combined with attention to detail and user-friendliness that many people who develop Windows software could give a rats behind about. They just don't get it.
With our newest release in the pipeline, we'll be continuing with that mantra. Users and Widget authors alike are going to be extremely pleased with what's brewing. New classes of Widgets are going to be possible, and we're very excited about it all.
Stay Tuned. |
Apparently "ease of use" to the Konfabulator developers means creating widgets in a text editor and juggling XML and JavaScript manually,then putting it all together, zipping it up, and renaming it to .widget.
By contrast, in DesktopX there's a nice UI for creating content. Konfabulator has no UI at all for creating content.
If someone just wants to USE widgets, then DesktopX 3's $14.95 version lets people run widgets exactly the same as Konfabulator. Plus DesktopX 3's client version supports objects and desktops which Konfabulator doesn't support at all. And the included widgets in DesktopX 3 are at least as polished and "easy to use" as what comes with Konfabulator.
Realistically, if Konfabulator hadn't had all the media attention and didn't have such high quality widgets made by the developers bundled with it, they'd be forced to explain why someone should pay $24.95 for Konfabulator when Kapsules, which supports .NET, supports more languages, has more features, etc. is free. Kapsules (www.widgetforge.com) competes with DesktopX too but not nearly as directly as it competes with Konfabulator.
