When someone holds a bloody knife and is standing over a bloody corpse and you witness this but not the murder itself, you can still ascertain the person has caused the deceased person's death. Anyone who says "its an opinion" is an ignoramus.
It is an opinion and I'm not an 'ignoramus'. Here's why. Assuming this happened on the street somewhere (hell it could be in a house or an office, I'm just choosing street), you did not witness the actual murder take place, therefor, you cannot accuse this person of being the murderer. Anything you say is strictly an opinion of what you think happened.
Yes this person is holding the knife, and the person they are standing over is bloodied and dead, but this is where a trained investigator trumps your statements.
First is the fact that there is no blood all over the person holding the knife. With the amount of blood everywhere, there will be blood on the attacker. This person cannot be the attacker based on basic crime scene science.
Second, let's just assume you mistakenly neglected to mention the person holding the bloody knife is also bloody. Let's review the footage from a closed circuit security camera on a nearby building that catches this murder. The victim is approached by the murderer and stabbed repeatedly, ultimately collapsing. Bystander runs over and proceeds to make a citizens arrest on the murderer or at least scare the murderer off so they can help the victim, they scuffle, blood is smeared everywhere on both people, the bystander manages to take the knife away and the murderer punches the bystander dazing that person and flees the scene. You appear from around the corner and see the bloody bystander standing over the victim, holding the bloody knife. You've now accused a Good Samaritan of being the murderer and proceed to testify that even though you didn't see a damned thing, you can confidently assume this person is the perpetrator of the crime.
Third, let's just assume you mistakenly neglected to mention the person standing over the body is covered in blood, and let's just assume that security footage does indeed show this person as being the one who stabbed the victim repeatedly, and thus murdered the victim. Your statements do not in any way shape or form lend any assistance to the conviction of this person holding the knife. It is hearsay as you did not witness anything. It is the security footage that witnesses the actual murder that makes the conviction. You may have the satisfaction in knowing you were right and fingered the correct person, but this is only because you got lucky and real evidence proved your statements to be correct.
Basically, what I'm saying here is to relax and understand that your logic has its flaws. You might feel that you're right that gamestop and steam are involved in some sort of scam, but as others have proven, the information is presented in a clear and unhidden fashion. Failure to read, or failure to understand what is being read is not the fault of the seller. Making a blind assumption that just because something that is well known to come with steam is made available on a different DD service such as impulse, that it will not contain steam is again, not the fault of the seller. These are the pointed out flaws in your logic.
Ive provided nothing but solid logic.
It might be solid to you, but to everyone else, it is flawed.
Personally, I don't buy anything from steam because I dislike having their stuff on my PC as I too see it as being overly aggressive and treats legit customers as thieves, while the real thieves completely bypass it within minutes to a couple of hours after its release. I don't have any personal issues against gamestop, but I'm not buying anything over Impulse either since I know there is the possibility of a title requiring steam. I would still much prefer to buy from the physical store so I can have a physical copy of my game, and in the event such a thing doesn't exist, for example Sins Entrenchment and Sins Diplomacy are digital downloads only, I will only buy them from the digital store that the company that made the title says to buy it from. If there are multiple choices, I will go with the one I dislike the least.