di7ra - Please refer to Stardock's Return Policy.

Only it's not a return but canceling a pre-order as here's no any OD2 yet but only beta with alot of bugs and lack of support. It's only a preview for those who's going to buy OD2. I wanted to buy it but i saw how developing is going to continue and have changed my mind.

If don't native 64bits  the 32bits soft work in protect zone

 and build svchost

 >> use more memory that if native 64bits

after if it amuses you have 50 process "svchost.exe"

not me

Alright, I can't find where to change running indicators for my zoomer.  It seems to be picking up the last know indicator from when 1.9 was installed.  (I did uninstall 1.9 prior to installing 2.0).  Also, on my tabbed docks, the plus/minus images are the stupid default ones.  I have my custom ones in my tabbed folders and code in my ini to match the location but they are not showing up.  Anyone have any ideas on either of these problems I'm having.

I like the icon reflection feature, it adds a nice touch to the tray docks and tray-like tiles.  I still feel it looks retarded on any other dock.

oh that sucks about the indicator.  thanks for the change on the plus/minus.  works like a charm now.  On a positive note, I did figure out how to get the reflections working on a tray dock positioned at the top of the screen. For the top position, I had to set IconEdgeOffset to -25 and then double the ReflectionOffset from 6 to 12.  Best not to use Zoom effect up there, because the reflection zooms with it and then it looks silly.

[Background]
Image = background.png
LeftWidth = 50
RightWidth = 50
TopHeight = 60
BottomHeight = 0
OutsideBorderLeft = 25
OutsideBorderRight = 25
OutsideBorderTop = 0
OutsideBorderBottom = 6
TileCenter = 0

ReflectionHeight = 35
ReflectionOffset = 6
ReflectionTaperOffAmount = 70
ReflectionTransparency = 50

HeightAdjust = 0
EdgeOffset = 0
IconEdgeOffset = 25
SeparatorEdgeOffset = 0

[BackgroundTop]
Image = background.png
LeftWidth = 50
RightWidth = 50
TopHeight = 60
BottomHeight = 0
OutsideBorderLeft = 25
OutsideBorderRight = 25
OutsideBorderTop = 0
OutsideBorderBottom = 4
TileCenter = 0

ReflectionHeight = 35
ReflectionOffset = 12
ReflectionTaperOffAmount = 70
ReflectionTransparency = 50

HeightAdjust = 0
EdgeOffset = 0
IconEdgeOffset = -25
SeparatorEdgeOffset = 0

I see what you are saying...that sucks?

The +/- images are not working for me, and I do have my paths set right. It might be a 64 bit issue.

I miss the features and functions of 1.9 more than I enjoy the new features of 2.0  If no news as to when these functions will be restored is forthcoming soon, I think I'll just use 1.9 until 2.0 is out of beta. I'm sure it will be worth the wait but for now I prefer a fully working version.

 I have both versions installed but having to run the old version just to make simple settings changes,unloading it ,then running the beta is a pita. 

Thanks for the opportunity to test it out though.

You know, it's great that we are able to fix this issue, but, it shouldn't be an issue in the first damn place.  Why change something like that?  It worked fine before.  Now folks have to change all their backgrounds?  That seems a bit stupid to me.  And I know I can't be the only one feeling like this.  So far, frustration seems to be the norm for OD 2.0 and me.  Anyone else?  I like the reflection and I really, really like the TrueStretch function but I'm not all that impressed so far.  Hopefully, the final release will be tons more polished.  Btw, I DO understand that this is just a beta so don't go all fanboy on me.

I honestly thought we'd be getting a Beta...i.e. something that's been worked on and brought to the point where it has all the prior functionality and added features to be tested, reported on and responded to (sorry about the preposition's position).

I agree with Wiz, natas2 and anarkys. I even went so far as to buy this for a friend. He isn't using it because it's so buggy.

di7ra also brought up an excellent response.

I think a well thought out response is in order which has a true (not a "we hope", or vague) target date we can expect completion by. I won't be looking at my watch, but I do however want a ball park date. I believe we are owed that.

agreed with the above 4 responses

I ought to point out that its been 1.5 months since the beta release (March 30th) and not two months.

I will see if I can find out what the plans are for the next ObjectDock beta update.