I've given the original post a rethought . I originally thought 'time for a failboat because , well , it's fail' but I now think he may have a point in a limited manner , if you look at it a certain way. It all depends on what you consider to be 'WC'
The ads are external. Anyone who buys poltical banner ads would get them posted on anything that has politcal in it.. You see it on Youtube all the time. Stardock had limited control of it. So that premise is fail. BTW,So much for the Liberal Internet
If you consider WC to be a 'Community' ( just WC , not the skinning community as a whole' ) I would disagree with WC being anti-Obama . The opinions expressed on the variety of threads on the subject were on both sides.
If you consider WC( and it's associated sites , since we just can't get away from JoeUser ) fourm moderation and such , I would think that there definately IS a anti-Obaama bias to an extent . There have been threads left open ( Island_Dog's for example ) that now appear to have devolved to a gigantic 'Lets see who the liberals are so the conservatives can badmouth them' troll. Ask yourself , would an Obama troll tread have lasted that long?
I don't expect it to change. And I'm not about to 'toss my toys out the pram' . I'm just asking that instead of blind 'no it's not ' that people look at it critically.