of 0.2% of GDP.
True with that comparison.
And a false argument. The point should not be to increase the percent of GDP consumption, but to increase revenues. But to a liberal, it is not about the money, but who should control it, so I guess that is why they cant see dollars for doughnuts.
There's a HUGE difference between a properly vetted and facted check news organization's main articles and the politico blogosphere who are writing simple OPINION-EDITORIAL pieces.
If someone can't be bothered to discern the difference between FACT and OPINION, then it's no surprise they have trouble reading between the lines to determine the TRUTH from SPIN.
SO US NEws and World is just a liberal Opinion rag? And you have some sort of documentation to support this?
Other than the fact you are probably right, what sources would you agree on? Since you have just excluded virtually every major mainstream news application with your sweeping condemnation. DO you know the difference? Somehow your sweeping negation of all sources indicates not.
Actually, that minority legal opinion has since been thoroughly discretid.
Regardless, the right of habeus corpus is one of the founding principles of Western Law for 400 years. And like the Geneva Conventions regarding torturing prisoners of War, they were established and agreed upon by all civilized nations specifically to keep TYRANTS from throwing away inalienable human rights in the name of FEAR, convenience, and expediency.
A lot of non sequitir, but it does not change the facts of the case, nor does trying to obfuscate the facts change them. If you would like to get back to the point, that is fine, however, the right does not exist. They can be granted priveleges, but not rights. Perhaps you should learn the difference.