Forum Home | Login

Josephs

Join Date 09/2004

SkinStudio 6 Suggestion

Sometimes, We Won't Want DWM

Hello Everyone,

This is mainly a suggestion directed at the developers of SkinStudio.

Recently, I've created a UIS1 Skin in SkinStudio Classic, And I've added the additional Vista components using SkinStudio 6. Which is all good, however, I've noticed that SkinStudio and WindowBlinds together use the Aero DWM Interface when applying skins.

This is fascinating, because the nature of the UIS1 Skin is to provide compatibility and performance. I don't see the importance, or use of either if the user is forced to use the Desktop Window Manager with Aero. Both are highly memory consuming, and probably aren't worth the efforts of UIS1.

I think a switch should be implemented, primarily in the skin's default specifications (alongside title, author, copyright, category etc.), which specifies whether the theme will use the Aero DWM, or the Classic DWM.

Who's With Me?
Josephs

(PS: Aero DWM being; Blurring, 3D Task Flip, Taskbar Previews and Per-Pixelness, which uses an average, 40MB of Memory. Classic DWM being similar to Windows XP, providing nothing but the basics. Using an average of 4MB of Memory.)

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Subscribe to this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post

Successfully updated karma reason!

If you have a DWM capable machine then you have no 2D hardware acceleration. So without the dwm on things tend to be rather sluggish when moving windows around.

This is not the case for people who have older graphics cards without DWM support as their drivers DO have 2d acceleration.

Successfully updated karma reason!

This is not the case for people who have older graphics cards without DWM support as their drivers DO have 2d acceleration.

Which Drivers? Their Video Drivers?
What kind of Video Driver which supports 3D DWM wouldn't have 2D Acceleration..

Perhaps my idea of DWM differs to yours?
All I know, is that when we're talking 3D Aero, we're talking +30MB Memory.
And I also know that when we're using the Windows Classic Scheme, or the Windows Basic Scheme, which is NOT 3D, DWM Uses under 10MB Memory.

I am simply suggesting the implementation of the switch, which explains to WindowBlinds to use the 3D, or 2D Version of DWM. My UIS1 Theme has no characteristics of 3D, Yet the 30MB is in use because of the Flip3D and Translucent parts of DWM. If I could use my UIS1 Theme on the DWM Similar to the Classic or Basic Schemes, Then it'd be more effective.

Successfully updated karma reason!

vStyler

Join Date 11/2004

+913

Seems like a valid point, I have to wonder why your creating a UIS1 skin in the days of gigs of ram tho?

Successfully updated karma reason!

Sign Up or Login and this ad disappears!
There are many great features available to you once you register. Sign Up for a free account and browse the forums without ads.

If you have a video card capable of running the DWM then the drivers for it provide no 2d HW acceleration. This is a 'feature' of Windows Vista.

So disabling the DWM will in fact slow down your computer vs having the DWM on. To see this open taskmanager and watch the cpu usage when you move a window around.

There is no 2D version of the DWM. The process remains running but it is doing nothing.

If you have XP drivers on Vista then things work like they do under XP and you get most of the 2d HW acceleration you get under XP.

Successfully updated karma reason!

The process remains running but it is doing nothing.

Exactly, I didn't mean to suggest the termination of DWM.exe, I meant how you've explained with the Basic version of DWM.
(The process remains running but it is doing nothing.)

If this could be equated to a USI1 Skin, then we would use less memory.
What we've figured out here, is DWM Comes in two flavors, Active and Inactive (However, the process is always running).

But Regardless, would you agree with me when I say an Active DWM which is used with Aero would be less appropriate than an Inactive DWM for a UIS1 Skin, ala Classic/Basic?

I have to wonder why your creating a UIS1 skin in the days of gigs of ram tho?

I'm a gamer, I want the most resources I can find, hence UIS1 if any.
We can't just accept Gigs of Ram and move on. UIS1 used to be a feature, and still should be. Honestly, I don't know too many people beefing up their computers just to run WindowBlinds...

Successfully updated karma reason!

Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.

There are many great features available to you once you register, including:

Richer content, access to many features that are disabled for guests like commenting and posting on the forums.
Access to a great community, with a massive database of many, many areas of interest.
Access to contests & subscription offers like exclusive emails.
It's simple, and FREE!

View all recent posts

Mark all posts as read Delete cookies created by the forum Return to Top

Stardock Forums v1.0.0.0 #108499 web02 Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000031 Page Render Time:

BootSkins XP	Cursor FX	Dream	Icon Packager
LogonStudio XP	LogonStudio	Object Dock	Sound Schemes
Suites	WallPapers	WindowBlinds	All

SkinStudio 6 Suggestion

SkinStudio 6 Suggestion

Sometimes, We Won't Want DWM

Icons

View Gallery List

Explore All

Customize This Menu