#47
| The more that we learn about Iraq and Al Qaeda, the deeper the connection runs. Certainly an ally has been eliminated and a hiding place made less secure. |
Actually, the more we learn, the more we know that they did not have the connection that you, Bush, and most other Republicans are hoping for.
| Aqua, what is not being done to find Ousama Bin Laden that you think should be? |
The CIA has been complaining for a long time that they were ordered to shift most of their assets from finding OBL to finding Saddam. I think that finding a man that killed over 4,000 Americans should be more important than finding someone the Republican National Party has held a grudge match with for over a decade.
| Where do you think we should shift our focus? More troops in Afganistan? Iran? Syria? |
I fully supported going to war in Afghanistan, OBL attacked us. Iraq/Saddam did not attack us, and so I did not and do not support that war. If you're one of the people claiming we were right in invading on moral grounds, then do you support the logical conclusion that we should invade over 60% of the rest of the world as well on the same grounds?
Sorry, but I'm not a war loving Republican. I used to be a Republican until I saw how Bush was more concerned with using the 9/11 attacks for personal gain, as an excuse to gift special interests with what they've been requesting for close to a decade, and to press his personal grudge match against Saddam.
FYI, I'm not a Democrat either, they're too soft and timid for my liking, though I find them better than the Republicans. Also, my opinions on Republicans and Democrats almost entirely apply only to the national level, at the state and local levels I've found the Republicans to be pretty good.
