Sign Up | Lost Login?
Firefox 3 Release & Stardock Site Compatibility
(Read More)
Zoomba
Jul 30, 2008 12:59

Firefox 3.0 goes final and is scheduled for release on Tuesday, June 17th.

There are currently known incompatibilities between Firefox 3 and many of our sites and forums. For the most part, the sites function properly, but have formatting issues. A specific example are the login & password fields to log into these forums. In Firefox 3, instead of both being on the same line, they are stacked vertically.

We will be addressing these visual issues in time. Please do NOT post threads on the forums pointing out Firefox 3 site issues. They will be deleted. We are aware of the problems and will work as quickly as we can to resolve them.

Until posted otherwise, the only version of Firefox our sites support at the moment is Firefox 2.

Stardock is a chaos club

By holomatrix69 Posted February 6, 2008 00:18:14
September 2007: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!
October 2007: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!
November 2007: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!
December 2007: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!
January 2008: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!
February 2008: DesktopX 3.5 arrives this month!

STARDOCK: F. Y.

It is a chaos club.
0 Karma 68 Replies 7 Referrals
3 Pages Jump to Page1 2 3 
Reply #1
jamespaulp
  • Member No.1,540,140
  • Karma0
February 6, 2008 00:20:40
Better be late than Vista   
Reply #2
Philly0381
  • Member No.1,638,996
  • Karma+43
February 6, 2008 00:22:08
STARDOCK: F. Y.


Not to hard to figure out what you are saying here holomatrix69.  

I think releasing an update to a program that works is more important than releasing one that doesn't.  

Reply #3
Pugboy
  • Member No.2,957,104
  • Karma0
February 6, 2008 00:25:02


Again?! Another person complaining... Why doesn't everyone get some popcorn, and turn on Auto Refresh? Be patient!
 
Advertisement
Sign Up or Login and this ad disappears!
There are many great features available to you once you register. Sign Up for a free account and browse the forums without ads.
Reply #4
DaveRI
  • Member No.709,321
  • Karma+2
February 6, 2008 01:22:29
Chaos? A little delay is Chaos? I must be using a different tape measure...
Reply #5
Skinhit
  • Member No.1,703,199
  • Karma+42
Online
February 6, 2008 01:34:45
Two tears in a bucket....
Reply #6
xscorpx
  • Member No.2,302,124
  • Karma+6
February 6, 2008 02:51:15
Where does it say it will arrive at such n such a time,i'm here everyday & i did'nt see it in the news on the home page while using IE,the least you could do is provide links to backup your post is it me or is this place being overrun by bampots






Reply #7
Fuzzy Logic
  • Member No.271,766
  • Karma+37
February 6, 2008 03:01:16

Where would we be without Chaos...

You will never go wrong with 'him' at your side   

Reply #8
Nimbin
  • Member No.2,343,221
  • Karma+19
February 6, 2008 03:58:12
remind me to set aside 5 minutes next week to give a damn about his complaint
Reply #9
2of3
  • Member No.2,598,923
  • Karma+50
February 6, 2008 04:57:04
I'm not gonna comment on this silly thread...... oh wait...... I just did



Damn
Reply #10
bobbyhundreds
  • Member No.391,474
  • Karma+2
February 6, 2008 05:03:22


  
Reply #11
WebGizmos
  • Member No.703,431
  • Karma+53
February 6, 2008 05:22:24
Sheeesh...Someone needs a life!
Reply #12
Hawkeye666
  • Member No.64
  • Karma+2
February 6, 2008 06:05:47
Once again we see an exhibition of an incredible grasp of the twin concepts of prioritization and allocation of limited development resources.

On a tangent, Chaos (entropy) is inescapable. Thermodynamics and all of that.

That which we cannot change...
Reply #13
Bioshock
  • Member No.2,492,425
  • Karma0
February 6, 2008 06:41:12
holomatrix69: Everybody that has something to do with Stardock or WC knows that Stardock try's very hard to produce great software and keep WC running smooth, all good thing take a good deal of time, and if you do not like what Stardock is doing why are you still here? nobody need to write

STARDOCK: F. Y.
It is a chaos club.

THAT WAS JUST UNCALLED FOR...
Reply #14
Quentin94
  • Member No.2,574,463
  • Karma+37
February 6, 2008 07:26:14
Dealing with Vista and his features and now with the SP1 comming to get the software running fine when it will be launch is not a easy thing to do and wait for a good finished product is better than get a product that doesn't work. 2Cents

As for your last words i agree with folks that wasn't necessary i wish you'll be more civil in your future comments.

Guys let him calm down
Reply #15
seppchen
  • Member No.3,000,627
  • Karma0
February 7, 2008 10:18:10

Better be late than Vista   


Try Vista SP1 !You will never mourn about good old XP again.
Reply #16
jamespaulp
  • Member No.1,540,140
  • Karma0
February 7, 2008 11:55:08
Try Vista SP1 !You will never mourn about good old XP again.


Ok, how about "better be late than Vista without SP1"       

The point was Vista should have come out with whatever is in SP1. Stardock is probably trying to do that. Get things right as much as possible before getting DesktopX out.
Reply #17
HG_Eliminator
  • Member No.306,363
  • Karma+45
February 7, 2008 12:33:23
I say if you think you can do it faster and better...go ahead.. lets see how well you do.



Sometimes things get delayed, the best bet is to be patient. In this world of instant gratification I realize that sometimes patience is no longer a virtue, but restraint and civility should not be cast to the wind.
Reply #18
Philly0381
  • Member No.1,638,996
  • Karma+43
February 7, 2008 13:12:16
It's nice to see that holomatrix69 has taken a few moments to come back and take part in this discussion.  Who knows, maybe his life is full of chaos to go along with Stardock.  
Reply #19
HG_Eliminator
  • Member No.306,363
  • Karma+45
February 7, 2008 13:30:11
From the fact that hes downloaded 0 megs from the site, compels me to think it's a member in disguise as not to get banned,
Reply #20
Zubaz
  • Member No.150,121
  • Karma+160
February 7, 2008 13:56:35
compels me to think it's a member in disguise as not to get banned
Please note that everything is spelled correctluy in the original post.
Reply #21
Philly0381
  • Member No.1,638,996
  • Karma+43
February 7, 2008 14:00:45
        
Reply #22
2of3
  • Member No.2,598,923
  • Karma+50
February 7, 2008 14:05:00
compels me to think it's a member in disguise as not to get banned


Ok fess up. Who is it?
Reply #23
Uvah
  • Member No.2,517,517
  • Karma+3
February 7, 2008 14:15:25
holomatrix69? Kinda strange that.
Reply #24
HG_Eliminator
  • Member No.306,363
  • Karma+45
February 7, 2008 14:27:36
Please note that everything is spelled correctluy in the original post.


LOL, well that pits me and you out of the suspect list...
Reply #25
Fuzzy Logic
  • Member No.271,766
  • Karma+37
February 7, 2008 19:29:21

spelled correctluy

  

3 Pages Jump to Page1 2 3 
View all recent posts
Mark all posts as read  •  Delete cookies created by the forum
Stardock Forums v1.5.3112.18688
© 1995-2008 Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved.
All times are EST. The time is now 20:58:59
Server Load Time: 00:00:00.0000016   Page Render Time:
Forum Categories
Sponsor
Recent Forum Activity