I tend to take a more affective view of what makes a winner--personal qualities versus a Rolls in the garage and three homes. I've known of several people like that (with all the "good stuff"), and I haven't been impressed by them as people at all
Wow. Just wow. Nothing in Brad's article said anything about material goods being any indication of whether a person is a winner or loser, but I'll say this, her statement above, and in fact her entire reply, indicates which side of that equation she puts herself on.
Not only does she consider herself a loser (and this is no secret, she has long suffered from severe self-esteem issues) but she seems to
resent those she percieves as 'winners.' She's also revealed the petty shallowness of her own personality by describing the criteria
she uses to define a 'winner,' (ie: a Rolls in the garage and three homes) while simultaneously denying that these are the criteria she uses.
She's "known several" and "hasn't been impressed by them," therefore, all wealthy people are snobbish assholes, and she prefers the company of other 'losers.' Losers who, by her own definition, do not have "all the good stuff"...despite the fact that they are drowning in personal debt due to failure at #s 4 and 5.
Wealthy = Evil
Poor = Virtuous
What a load of crap.
But I do agree with her assessment of herself, and hope she includes her husband in that assessement. The pair of them are grotesquely obese, unhealthy, unhappy, and unable to retain employment for any significant length of time, deeply in debt over frivolous spending and the utter inability to delay gratification, which of course, is her
father's fault for dying before she could learn fiscal responsibility skills from him...
Ryan and I suck at money. I know why I suck at managing money. My dad was the "financial guru" of the house, and he passed away before I understood that I needed to have those skills.
...which happens to illustrate another one of Brad's points quite nicely.
Makes excuses for every set back and blames others for failure. Another easy way to spot a loser is the plethora of excuses they give. Nothing is ever their fault. You can even get an idea to what degree of loser the person is by how ridiculous their excuses are. The greater the length the person goes to avoid taking responsibility the bigger the loser.
Good grief, this woman (and her husband) is college educated, and in fact is working towards a Master's degree at the moment. She is in her mid-20's, and her father died several years ago. Yet she cannot manage her money because he was the ONLY source of information in the ENTIRE world for her.
No other adult could offer advice, no books have ever been written on the topic, and no basic math was offered at the college where she earned her teaching degree. (yeah, ain't that sad?) So she was all on her own in this big cruel world of high finance and was forced into taking on over 100k in debt on mobile homes, motorcycles, and brand new cars before she had any idea what she was doing.
It's an
excuse, and a
ridiculous one at that. Besides, it's more about self-control than it is about math, self-control that comes with maturity, maturity that seems severely retarded in these two.
Failing to maintain employment? Well that's always someone else's fault too. Tragic victims of circumstance, neither of them has ever done
one wrong thing, yet neither of them has been invited to teach a second year at any of the three (four now?) schools they've taught at.
See #6 on the Loser list.
Sees themselves as victims or having "bad luck". Nothing screams "loser" louder than someone saying how some authority figure "had it out for them." Please. While there are certainly bad actors out there, nearly always it's just a loser trying to argue how they just got screwed rather than recognizing that maybe they should have done what they were supposed to be. "Oh, she had it out for me, she was just waiting for me to show up twice in a row stoned so that she could fire me!"
I'm glad Marcie commented here, because she's provided an excellent example for many of Brad's points. Which is why she completely INGORED all that in favor of telling us how 'superior' she is for not thinking materially when measuring a person's success and then turning around and doing just that, revealing a deep bigotry towards the financially successful, a bigoty born out of pure jealousy, resentment, and blame.
Loser.
(ps- i hope you didn't mind me getting bare-knuckled on this one, Brad, these two just really frost my ass, haha.)